论文部分内容阅读
现代新儒家的代表人物,无不对朱熹、陆象山思想之异同有所关注并有所论述,个中缘由当然是“朱陆异同为中国儒学八百年来之一大公案”1,从而成为无法绕开的问题。对朱、陆异同论述尤细者为熊十力的两大弟子唐君毅与牟宗三,而事实上此二人的朱、陆异同论又大有所别。依笔者之见,唐君毅的朱、陆异同论在见解上似更具合理性与通透性,而非牵强的个人臆断。故笔者不揣冒昧特撰此文以求教方家。需要强调的是,唐君毅对朱、陆的辨异功夫虽细,但更能从学术思想史的
Representatives of modern Neo-Confucianism all have their own concerns and similarities about the similarities and differences between Zhu Xi and Lu Xiangshan’s thought. Of course, the reason for this is that “Zhu and Lu are the same as one of the great Confucianists in China over the past eight hundred years” 1 Become unable to bypass the issue. On Zhu, Lu different with the discussion of the Xiong Shili’s two disciples Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan, but in fact the two Zhu, Lu Xun and the theory is different. According to the writer’s opinion, Tang Junyi’s Zhu and Lu Xun’s theories seem more reasonable and penetrating in their opinions, rather than their own assumptions. Therefore, I do not presume to extradite this article in order to teach Fang Fang. Need to be emphasized is that Tang Junyi on Zhu, Lu discrimination is fine, but more from the history of academic thought