论文部分内容阅读
《民俗研究》90年第三期刊登邱国珍《“哭嫁”面面观》,读后收益非浅,颇受启发。但文中关于哭嫁起源的观点,委实难以苟同。本着百家争鸣的学术方针,愿将拙见与邱氏商榷,并且就教于各位同行。邱文说:“从人——尤其是女人——的情感角度看,这(指掠夺婚)无疑是一种野蛮的强制婚姻形式,不难想象,被抢夺的女子是如何的惊恐万状、痛哭流涕!由恐惧而哭泣,这是一种心理过程,也是一种抗争方式。……从此往后,‘哭’与‘嫁’竞结下
The third issue of “Folklore Research” published in Qiu Guozhen’s 90th Anniversary of “Crying Married” was a very rare and entertaining reading. But the article on the origin of crying marriage point of view, it is difficult to agree. In the academic policy of contending for a hundred schools of thought, I wish to see my humble opinion and Khoo’s discussion, and teach you to travel. Qiu Wen said: "From the emotional point of view of people, especially women, it is undoubtedly a barbaric form of compulsory marriage. It is not hard to imagine how the women who were being snatched were in a state of horror. Tears! Crying by fear is a psychological process and a way of protest ... From then on, crying and marrying