论文部分内容阅读
目的观察比较腹部超声与经阴道超声对宫内膜病变诊断的效果。方法选取医院收治的子宫内膜病变患者100例,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组50例。对照组进行腹部超声检查确诊,观察组进行阴道超声检查确诊,将2组相关结果与最终病理诊断结果进行对比分析。结果经阴道超声更接近于病理诊断结果,观察组诊断正确率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于临床确诊子宫内膜病变来说,经阴道超声诊断优于腹部超声诊断,并且能够发现较为微小的病灶,值得临床广泛应用。
Objective To compare the effects of abdominal ultrasound and transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. Methods 100 cases of endometrial lesions were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group, 50 cases in each group. The control group was diagnosed by abdominal ultrasonography and the observation group was diagnosed by vaginal ultrasonography. The results of two groups were compared with the final pathological diagnosis results. Results Transvaginal ultrasound was more close to the pathological diagnosis, the observation group was higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion For clinical diagnosis of endometrial lesions, transvaginal ultrasound is superior to abdominal ultrasound diagnosis, and can find more tiny lesions, it is widely used in clinical.