论文部分内容阅读
田野调查是一个很有趣的问题,既涉及方法论,又是目前难以实践的实际问题。切实做好田野调查,是当前我国民族学研究亟待解决的问题。去年底我曾去日韩访问,在汉城一所大学有人提出:“有的中国教授说目前中国没有一个像样的田野调查的专家,但最近又有人在一本杂志上列举六位从事田野调查的代表人物,不知这两种意见谁是谁非?”提得很尖锐。我只好说:“头一种意见说得严重了,其实中国有许多杰出的从事田野调查的学者。”中国民族田野调查的兴起,首先应归功于蔡元培,1928年他出任中央研究院院长,兼任民族学组长,极力提倡民族调查,做出了重大贡献①。依我初步分析,我国民族田野
Fieldwork is a very interesting issue that involves both methodologies and practical issues that are currently difficult to put into practice. To do a good job of field investigation is a problem to be solved urgently in the ethnology research of our country. I visited Japan and South Korea at the end of last year. Someone at a university in Seoul suggested: “Some Chinese professors said that at present there is no such thing as a fieldwork expert in China. Recently, however, some have listed in a magazine field investigation The representative, I do not know who these two opinions who is not? ”“ Very sharp mention. I have to say: ”The first comment is a serious one. In fact, there are many outstanding academics engaged in field research in China." The rise of the Chinese nationality field investigation firstly owed to Cai Yuanpei and in 1928 he served as a member of the Central Research Institute Long, part-time ethnology leader, strongly advocated ethnic investigation, made a significant contribution ①. According to my preliminary analysis, China’s ethnic fields