论文部分内容阅读
在当前“信息爆炸”的形势下,如何正确定量评价分析科技论文的质量是一大问题。对此,国内外一直沿用的办法是以科技文献与其作者的被引用次数作为衡量论文价值的标准。这一方法固然有其优越之处,但若仔细推敲,其弊端也是明显的。一、不能明确反映论文先进性的程度。一篇论文之所以被他人引用,往往因为其具有先进性。但是,先进性的程度却因论文不同而异。有的仅比同行略为优先,有的却远远超越同代人,甚至相当长时期内无法被人理解。如美国女生物学家B.麦克林托克早在40年代就发现“跳跃基因”,可直到70年代才逐渐被人承认和认识,80年代才以81岁
In the current “information explosion” situation, how to correctly and quantitatively evaluate the quality of scientific papers is a major issue. In this regard, the method that has been used both at home and abroad is based on the quotation of scientific literature and its authors as a measure of the value of theses. Although this method has its advantages, its drawbacks are obvious if it is carefully considered. First, can not clearly reflect the degree of advanced paper. The reason why a thesis is cited by others is often because of its advanced nature. However, the degree of advancement varies from paper to paper. Some only slightly more than their peers, while others far outnumber their contemporaries and can not even be understood for a long time. Such as the United States female biologist B. McClintock as early as the 40s found that “jumping genes”, until 70 time was gradually recognized and recognized only 80 years to 81 years old