论文部分内容阅读
AIM:To study the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced gastric cancer by performing a meta-analysis of the published studies.METHODS:All published controlled trials of NAC for advanced gastric cancer vs no therapy before surgery were searched.Studies that included patients with metastases at enrollment were excluded.Databases included Cochrane Library of Clinical Comparative Trials,MEDLINE,Embase,and American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting abstracts from 1978 to 2010.The censor date was up to April 2010.Primary outcome was the odds ratio (OR) for improving overall survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer.Secondary outcome was the OR for down-staging tumor and increasing R0 resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer.Safety analyses were also performed.All calculations and statistical tests were performed using RevMan 5.0 software.tric cancer enrolled in 14 trials were divided into NAC group (n=1054) and control group (n=1217).The patients were followed up for a median time of 54 mo.NAC significantly improved the survival rate [OR=1.27,95% confidence interval (CI):1.04-1.55],tumor stage (OR=1.71,95% CI:1.26-2.33) and R0 resection rate (OR=1.51,95% CI:1.19-1.91) of patients with advanced gastric cancer.No obvious safety concerns were raised in these trials.CONCLUSION:NAC can improve tumor stage and survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer with a rather good safety.
AIM: To study the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced gastric cancer by performing a meta-analysis of the published studies. METHODS: All published controlled trials of NAC for advanced gastric cancer vs no therapy before surgery were searched.Studies that included patients with metastases at enrollment were excluded. Databases included Cochrane Library of Clinical Comparative Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, and American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting abstracts from 1978 to 2010. censor date was up to April 2010. Primarily outcome was the odds ratio ( OR) for improving overall survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Second outcome was the OR for down-staging tumor and increasing R0 resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Safety analyzes were also performed. All calculations and statistical tests were performed using RevMan 5.0 software.tric cancer enrolled in 14 trials were divided into NAC group (n = 1054) and control group (n = 1217). The patients were followed up for a median time of 54 mo.NAC significantly improved the survival rate [OR = 1.27,95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.55], tumor stage (OR = 1.71,95% CI: 1.26-2.33) and R0 resection rate (OR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.91) of patients with advanced gastric cancer. No obvious safety concerns were raised in these trials. CONCLUSION: NAC can improve tumor stage and survival rate of patients with advanced gastric cancer with a rather good safety.