论文部分内容阅读
《新闻战线》第二期揭露了1982年《奥秘》画刊上发表的《猴子报案——一个真实的故事》,是纯属虚构。去年,《解放军报通讯》也曾以《猴子三闹军报》为题,披露了《猴子牧猪》,《猴子捡燕窝》等三篇都是失实报道。随着时间的推移,诸猴大闹各报的“风波”虽然平息,但小小猴子,竟能登堂入室,数闹各报,引起读者抗议,逼得报刊“更正”,确实值得我们深思。文责自负,主要责任当然应该由作者承担。但我们的编辑为什么总是受“猴子”的骗呢?为什么从众多的稿件中总爱挑这些东西编发
The second issue of the “News Front” exposes the “Monkey Story - A True Story” published in the 1982 mystery magazine, which is purely fictional. Last year, the “People’s Liberation Army Daily News” also once pointed out the title of “Three Rams of the Monkeys” and disclosed that “monkey grazing pigs” and “monkey picking bird’s nest” were all illegitimately reported. As time went by, all the tyranny of the tyranny of the monkeys staged a confrontation. Although the “storm” of the various newspapers subsided, the little monkeys actually went to the den courts and reported newspapers in protest. This caused the readers’ protests and forced the newspapers to make “corrections” that really deserved our consideration. Responsibility at your own responsibility, of course, the main responsibility should be borne by the author. Why is it that our editors are always fooled by “monkeys?” Why do we always pick these things from a large number of manuscripts?