论文部分内容阅读
目的通过临床实验比较国产凤康牌TM聚氨酯女用安全套(FC2)和进口Femidom牌聚氨酯女用安全套(FC1)的性能。方法采用随机交叉实验方法,从2007年9月到12月底,在南方沿海的一个小城市进行了随机交叉实验研究。结果291名性工作者一共使用了3 428个FC2和3 369个FC1。27.1%的人认为FC2的外观设计好,22%的人认为FC1的设计好。两种女用安全套在使用时破裂(FC2=2.9%,FC1=3.6%)、一次放置到位(FC2=63.1%,FC1=65.4%)、感觉有外环(FC2=58.1%,FC1=59.3%)、感觉有内环(FC2=48.7%,FC1=50.7%)、阴茎从套外进入(FC2=11.8%,FC1=12.9%)、外环被压到阴道内(FC2=8.0%,FC1=7.1%)、有不适感(FC2=31.6%,FC1=29.4%)等方面没有明显差异。结论国产凤康牌女用安全套(FC2)和进口Femidom牌女用安全套(FC1)在基本性能方面相似。更多的女性工作者认为FC2的外观设计较好。
Objective To compare the performance of domestic Fengkang TM polyurethane female condom (FC2) and imported Femidom polyurethane female condom (FC1) through clinical trials. Methods A random crossover experimental study was conducted in a small city along the southern coast from September 2007 to the end of December 2007. Results 291 sex workers used a total of 3 428 FC2 and 3 369 FC1. 27.1% of people thought that the appearance of FC2 was good, and 22% thought that FC1 was designed well. The two female condoms ruptured during use (FC2 = 2.9%, FC1 = 3.6%) and once placed in place (FC2 = 63.1%, FC1 = 65.4% (FC2 = 48.7%, FC1 = 50.7%), the penis entered the cuff (FC2 = 11.8%, FC1 = 12.9%) and the outer ring was compressed into the vagina (FC2 = 8.0%, FC1 = 7.1%). There was no significant difference in discomfort (FC2 = 31.6%, FC1 = 29.4%). Conclusion Domestic Fengkang brand of female condom (FC2) and imported Femidom brand of female condom (FC1) are similar in basic performance. More female workers think that FC2’s design is better.