论文部分内容阅读
对於漢語語法体系,直到现在,專家們之間意見还是很分歧的。这些分歧,正有待於認真的虚心的討論来解决。这裏就主語賓語这個問題說一說我们学習的体会,供語文工作者们考慮。一句話裏,主語是叙述或說明的对象,謂語是对主語的叙述或說明。这個定義,应該說是符合漢語实際的。但是有的語法学者堅决反对,認爲主語一定是動作的主体,謂語一定是述說主体的動作。从这樣的認識出發,就認爲,「王冕在七歲上死了父親」这句話,王冕是主語「父親」的附加語,並不是主語。「大字筆寫大字,小字筆寫小字」的「大字筆」和「小字筆」也只能是附加語,修飾「寫」,表示「寫」这個動作所用的工具,主語是「人」,省略了。这樣的解释是正碓的嗎?我们可以請問任何一個說漢語或懂漢語的人,当他听見有人說「王冕在七歲上死了父親」的時候,他觉得这句話的意思是在說明「王冕」呢,还是在說明那個已經死了的「父親」?我們敢断定:「王冕」是要說明的对象,是用「在七歲上死了父親」做謂語,來說明他的身世。「王冕」顯然是这句話
As far as the Chinese grammar system is concerned, opinions among experts are still very divergent. These differences are awaiting serious, open-minded discussions to resolve. Here we talk about the subject of the object subject to our understanding of learning, for the language workers to consider. In one sentence, the subject is the object of the narrative or description, and the predicate is the description or description of the subject. This definition should be said to be in line with Chinese practice. However, some grammarians strongly oppose that the subject must be the subject of action, and the predicate must be the action of the subject. Starting from this understanding, he believes that “Wang Shuo died father at the age of seven.” Wang Shuo is an accessory of the subject “father,” not the subject. The “big-character pens” and “small-character pens” in the “big-character pens with large characters and small-character pens and small characters” can only be additional words. The word “writing” is used to denote the tool used to “write” this movement. The subject is “person”. Omitted. Is this explanation correct? We can ask any person who speaks Chinese or understands Chinese. When he hears someone saying, “Wang Shuo died at the age of seven,” he thought this sentence meant In explaining “Wang Shuo,” is it still to explain the “father” who has died? We dared to conclude that “Wang Shuo” was the object to be explained. It was explained by using the phrase “who died at the age of seven” as a predicate. His life experience. “Wang Shuo” is obviously this sentence