论文部分内容阅读
法国1958宪法创设的宪法委员会,履行着法国法律审查的司法职能。从1958年起的50年间,法国只有法律事前审查,即对经两院投票未正式颁布的法律进行合宪性审查。直到2008年,对已颁布法律的事后审查才引入法国。这两种审查方式构成法国的法律审查制度,它们共同存在且相互不能替代,各有其独立功能。2011年宪法委员会受理一起关于就《法国海关法典》中海关没收条款的合宪性先决问题审查申请(案号:n°2011-208-QPC),要求对海关没收货物职权的合宪性问题予以审查。该审查申请特别提到,海关没收制度的规定侵犯了货主的财产所有权和司法救济权。宪法委员会做出了予以审查的决定,并做出了否定性判决。
The constitutional commission created by the French Constitution of 1958 performs the judicial functions of the French law. In the 50 years from 1958 France had only a priori legal review of the constitutional review of laws that had not been formally promulgated by the two chambers. It was not until 2008 that France was introduced for the after-censorship of enacted laws. These two forms of examination constitute the legal review system in France. They coexist and can not replace each other and each has its own independent function. In 2011, the Constitutional Council entertained an application for review of the constitutional prerequisite for the seizure of articles of Customs under the French Customs Code (Case No. n 2011-208-QPC), requesting that the issue of the constitutionality of the powers of the Customs for confiscation of goods be given Review. In particular, the review application mentioned that the provisions of the system of confiscation of goods violated the owner’s property ownership and judicial remedy. The Constitutional Council made a decision to review and made a negative verdict.