论文部分内容阅读
“供给侧改革”对政府的政策服务提出了更高的要求,而产业政策与竞争政策则是最主要的两大政策工具。本文首先对产业政策与竞争政策的概念进行界定,而后对两者之间进行协调的可能性进行了理论探讨。案例部分则对我国大陆地区、台湾地区以及日本的产业政策与竞争政策的搭配模式进行了对比,研究发现,日本属于结构主义控制方式,我国台湾地区正逐渐将产业政策寓于竞争政策之中,大陆地区则是以产业政策为主,竞争政策为补漏性工具。最后,在借鉴日本与台湾地区经验并结合我国国情的基础上,给出了相应的政策建议。
“Supply-side reform ” put forward higher requirements on the government’s policy service, while industrial policy and competition policy are the two most important policy tools. This article first defines the concept of industrial policy and competition policy, and then makes a theoretical discussion on the possibility of coordination between the two. The case part contrasts the collocation pattern of industrial policy and competition policy in mainland China, Taiwan region and Japan. The study finds that Japan belongs to the structuralist control method. China’s Taiwan region is gradually placing industrial policy in the competition policy. The region is dominated by industrial policies and competition policies are complementary tools. Finally, based on the experience of Japan and Taiwan and the combination of China’s national conditions, the corresponding policy recommendations are given.