论文部分内容阅读
拉考夫(G.Lakoff)对像似性的相关理论作出过重要贡献,随后学界对隐喻的研究逐渐兴起。然而拉考夫对隐喻的本质进行了错误的解读,他认为其本质是对现象进行有意的错误分类从而产生语义张力。本论文基于对皮尔斯分类的解释,认为拉考夫所研究的是图表,而非真正的隐喻。隐喻作为一种功能范畴,尽管在图像与语言中呈现出多种差异,但仍可在图像中实现。图像隐喻具有双重像似性,因此存在一种发掘相似性的双重发现程序。
G. Lakoff made a significant contribution to the related theory of iconicity, and then the academic research on metaphor gradually emerged. However, Rakoff made a wrong interpretation of the essence of metaphor, which he believes is the essence of semantic tension caused by deliberate misclassification of phenomena. Based on an explanation of Pierce’s classification, this paper argues that Rakov studied graphs rather than real metaphors. As a functional category, metaphor can be implemented in images despite its many differences in image and language. Image metaphor has dual image similarity, so there is a double discovery program to explore the similarity.