论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究不同采血方法进行血常规检验的临床价值。方法:择80例于本院2016年4月至2017年3月接受血常规检验的患者作为研究对象,按照随机数表,平均分为两组——参考组和观察组,参考组采取末梢血采集法,观察组采取静脉血采集法,观察不同采血方法的临床效果。结果:观察组患者血常规检验结果中的HB、RBC、HCT、WBC、PLT均优于参考组,差异显著,符合统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者检验结果中的MCHC值无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:静脉血采集法应用于血常规检验中,效果明显优于末梢采血法。
Objective: To study the clinical value of different blood sampling methods in blood tests. Methods: Eighty patients who underwent routine blood tests from April 2016 to March 2017 in our hospital were divided into two groups according to the random number table: the reference group and the observation group. The reference group received peripheral blood Acquisition method, the observation group to take venous blood collection method to observe the clinical effect of different blood collection methods. Results: HB, RBC, HCT, WBC, PLT in the blood test results of the observation group were better than the reference group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in MCHC between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Venous blood collection method used in blood tests, the effect was significantly better than the peripheral blood collection method.