论文部分内容阅读
本文从行政法律责任概念的语义分析入手,在法规范的语境中从逻辑形式、社会事实和价值评价机制三个方面阐释了行政法律责任概念完整的构造,进而展开对行政法研究方法的思考。文章认为,作为法律学分支的行政法学之研究方法,应当在综合考量法的各组成要素的前提下,以法规范为其核心研究对象,着重于法规范本身的逻辑及形式层面的阐释,同时又不排斥法律中的价值考量,在实证规范的约束下寻求价值的客观化,从而避免沦为极端的法律实证主义。另外,行政法学还应该是一门具有教义性质的学科,它要求研究者的认知过程必须受到预置规则的限制,而不能流于形而上或本体论或社会学意义上的探究。文章指出,中国大陆行政法学上行政法律责任的误区在于:忽视了这一法律基本概念的教义性和规范性,从而将法律责任的研究导入非法律学的歧途。
This article begins with the semantic analysis of the concept of administrative legal liability, explains the complete structure of the concept of administrative legal liability from the logical form, social facts and value evaluation mechanism in the context of legal norms, and then starts thinking on the research methods of administrative law . The article holds that the research method of administrative law as a branch of law should take law norms as its core research object and comprehensively consider the logic and formal level of legal norms itself, Nor does it exclude the consideration of value in law and seek the objectivity of value under the constraints of the positive norms so as to avoid being reduced to extreme legal positivism. In addition, administrative law should be a doctrinal discipline, which requires that the cognitive process of the researcher must be limited by the preset rules, and can not be metaphysical or ontological or sociological inquiry. The article points out that the misunderstanding of the administrative legal responsibility in Chinese administrative jurisprudence lies in the ignorance of the doctrinal and normative nature of the basic concepts of the law, which leads the study of legal liability into the wrong path of non-legal science.