论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨阑尾炎不同术式的临床效果。方法：选取2014年7月1日至2014年12月31日在我院住院可行腔镜手术、亦可行开腹手术的阑尾炎患者30名，随机行传统开腹手术、多（3或4）孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术、经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术，对比研究三种不同术式的临床效果。结果：在手术时间、住院费用上，传统手术优于腔镜手术（P<0.05）；在住院日和肛管排气时间上，腔镜手术优于传统手术（P<0.05）；在切口长度上，经脐单孔腔镜术优于其余两种术式（P<0.05）；在术中出血量方面，三种术式间都有区别（P<0.05）。结论：阑尾炎的各种术式均有优缺点，在实际临床中，可根据具体情况实施不同的术式。“,”ObjectiveTo explore the clinical effect of different surgical methods forappendicitis.Methods30 patients withappendicitiswere selected from 1 January 2014 to December 31,2014in our hospital,which can be imposed laparoscopic appendectomy and open conventional appendectomy . Random practice open conventional appendectomy, muple-hole laparoscopic appendectomy, transumbilical single hole laparoscopic appendectomy. Study the clinical effect of three kinds of style.ResultsTheopen conventional appendectomy is bertter than laparoscopic appendectomy on the operation time and hospitalization expenses(P<0.05). The laparoscopic appendectomy is bertter thantheopen conventional appendectomy on the days of hospitalization and anal exhaust time (P<0.05). The transumbilical single hole laparoscopic appendectomy is bertter thanthe other two kinds of operation on the length of the incision(P<0.05). The three groups are different on the amount of bleeding during the operation(P<0.05).ConclusionsThere are both advantages and disadvantages in the various operation ofappendicitis. In clinical practice , select the differentoperations according to specific situation.