论文部分内容阅读
本文通过分析两篇经典启蒙文献 ,即康德的《回答这个问题 :什么是启蒙》和福柯的《什么是启蒙》 ,指出以康德为代表的传统启蒙精神与福柯所代表的消解启蒙的主张之间的根本差异所在 ,并借此揭示出他们的视野所不及之处 :这就是启蒙以及启蒙的出路究竟是人本身的变化还是关于人的认识变化 ?而无论是人本身的变化还是关于人的认识的变化 ,人们必须关切的乃是在这些变化之中人本身究竟经历了什么样的变化。
This article analyzes two classic Enlightenment documents, namely Kant’s “Answering this question: What is enlightenment” and “What is enlightenment” by Foucault, pointing out that the traditional enlightenment spirit represented by Kant and the suggestion of digestion and enlightenment represented by Foucault The fundamental difference between them, and to reveal their vision is out of place: This is the way to enlightenment and enlightenment is the change of people or about people’s awareness of change? Whether it is the change of people or about people , One must be concerned with what changes have actually taken place in these changes among themselves.