论文部分内容阅读
司马迁在早期庄子、屈原之接受史上占有无可置疑的重要地位。某种意义上可以说,司马迁对庄、屈的态度,对此后两千年的庄、屈接受史具有显在的规范作用,而《史记》庄、屈二传在后世的庄、屈研究中,更具有不容忽视的文献价值。作一简略追溯可知:在司马迁之前的庄、屈接受史上,汉初的贾谊、淮南王刘安实有开先河的作用。贾谊被贬后所作《吊屈原赋》最早提及屈原之名,并对屈原的行事遭际寄予无
Sima Qian in the early Zhuangzi, Qu Yuan accepted the history of undoubtedly occupy an important position. In a sense, it can be said that Sima Qian’s attitude toward Zhuang and Chu led him to have a marked normative effect on the past two thousand years of Zhuang and Shu’s acceptance of history. However, during the study of Zhuang and Chu in later chapters, More can not be ignored literature value. To make a brief tracing, we can see that before the demolition of Sima Qian, it was accepted that Jia Yi in early Han Dynasty and Liu An in Huainan Wang had a precedent. Jia Yi was derogatory made by “Qu Yuan Fu Yuan,” the earliest reference to the name of Qu Yuan, and Qu Yuan’s behavior was confined to