论文部分内容阅读
《汉语学习》这块语言科学园地已经开辟了十载了,它也经过一些风风雨雨,但一直很有生气,为汉语言科学的发展和汉语言科学的学习做出了可喜的贡献。 《汉语学习》在“稿约”中一直明确宣告刊发文章不囿于一家之说,欢迎不同学派不同观点的文章。《汉语学习》是这样说的,也是这样做的,因此,这块园地欣欣向荣。 确实,在语言研究中有不同的学派、不同的观点、不同的方法,写文章有不同的路子、不同的角度,写出的文章也有不同的表述形式、不同的语言风格。我想,只要文章语言材料翔实,分析论证有力,见解富有新意,都应该受到欢迎。 学术发展,还常常要在一些基本问题上突破旧的成说,甚至是“定论”。如拙文《语
The language learning field of “Chinese learning” has been opened for ten years. It has also experienced some ups and downs, but it has been very lively. It has made gratifying contributions to the development of Chinese language science and the study of Chinese language science. Chinese Learning has always clearly proclaimed in the Draft Covenant that the published articles are not less than one. They welcome articles from different schools of thought. This is how “Chinese learning” is said and is done. Therefore, this area is thriving. Indeed, there are different schools of thought, different perspectives, different approaches, and different ways of writing articles in different linguistic studies. Articles written in different languages also have different forms of presentation. I think as long as the language of the article is informative, powerful analysis and analysis, innovative ideas, should be welcomed. In academic development, we often have to break through the old theories and sayings on some basic issues, and even “make a conclusion.” Such as Zhuo Wen "language