论文部分内容阅读
1、音乐民族学和音乐心理学:互补或分枝的研究方法 音乐民族学和音乐心理学领域的交叉点最大程度上是基于有关音乐本质的问题需要加以论述。简化论的论点是这个问题的中心所在,即:人们能靠把说明知觉和认识过程的音乐体验进行归类来断定音乐的意义吗?大多数的音乐民族学家对此的看法是:凭观察研究,特别是按照论证音乐意义与之文化和历史背景演化的紧密关系的音乐民族学著作,是难以接近音乐意义的本质的。而且,因为正在进行的非西方音乐的观察研究很少,因此,在具有跨文化观的音乐中探知认识过程的本质也是困难的。那么有完全对立或互相渗透的学科吗?
1. Music ethnology and music psychology: complementary or branched research methods The intersection of music ethnology and music psychology is based largely on issues that need to be addressed in relation to the nature of music. The argument of simplification is at the heart of the question: can one conclude the meaning of music by categorizing the musical experience that illustrates the process of perception and recognition? Most music ethnologists see this as observing Research, especially music ethnography based on demonstrating the close relationship between the musical meanings and the cultural and historical contexts, is inaccessible to the essence of musical meanings. Moreover, as there are few observational studies of ongoing non-Western music, it is also difficult to detect the nature of the epistemological process in intercultural music. Is there a completely antagonistic or interdisciplinary discipline?