论文部分内容阅读
“新闻战线”第四期上有一篇“不要忘记一般地区和后进地区”的批评文章是针对山西日报写的.我认为批评中有正确的部分,也有一些有益的意见,无疑,这都值得山西日报加以检查和改进,力求在报道中克服这种可能克服的缺点;但批评中也有一些值得商榷的观点,更有一些不符事实的指责,这也需要我们加以很好的探讨和实事求是的说明.关于批评中的一些事实的说明文章中指责道:山西日报的报道地区不平衡,忽视后进或一般地区,因而有些通讯员编出这样一段快板:“农业生产是长治,统购统销有晋南,临时消息抓榆次,雁北、忻县不见面.“我认为这段快板的内容和事实是有出入的.山西日报的报道是不是”农业生产是长治,统购统销有晋南,临时消息抓榆次,雁北、忻县不见面”呢?这里我不妨从统计数字来加以考察.去年
A critical article in the fourth issue of the “News Front”, “Do not forget the general area and the backward areas,” was written for the Shanxi Daily, and I think there is a correct part of the criticism and some helpful suggestions. Undoubtedly, It is worthy of checking and improving Shanxi Daily to strive to overcome such shortcomings that may be overcome in the report. However, there are some debatable views in criticism, some of which are not in conformity with the facts. This also requires us to explore and seek truth from facts Description Some critiques of the facts in the article accused: Shanxi Daily reported uneven geographical coverage, neglect or general area, so some correspondents compiled such an allegretto: “Agricultural production is Changzhi, the purchase and sale of unified marketing with the South Jinnan, Temporary news caught Yuci, Yanbei, Xin County does not meet. ”I think this Allegro content and facts are different. Shanxi Daily reported is not“ agricultural production is Changzhi, the purchase and marketing of unified marketing with Jinnan, temporary news Catch Yuci, Yanbei, Xin County does not meet ”Here? I may wish to examine from the statistics last year