论文部分内容阅读
目的对疤痕子宫再次妊娠的分娩方式进行合理的分析与选择。方法回顾性分析2012年1月~2014年1月我院诊治的疤痕子宫患者180例的临床资料进行研究,并根据分娩方式的不同将其划分为观察组与对照组,各90例。对两组患者的新生儿阿氏(APgar)评分及并发症发生率进行比较。结果观察组患者的新生儿APgar评分与并发症发生率等指标均明显优于对照组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于疤痕子宫再次妊娠患者而言,以阴道分娩的方式进行分娩具有较高的安全性,可作为优先考虑。
Objective To analyze and choose the mode of delivery of scar pregnancy again. Methods A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 180 patients with uterine scar treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2014 was conducted. According to different modes of delivery, they were divided into observation group and control group, 90 cases each. Neonatal APgar scores and complication rates were compared between the two groups. Results In the observation group, the index of neonatal APgar score and complication rate were significantly better than those of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions For patients with scarred uterine re-pregnancy, delivery by vaginal delivery has higher safety and may be given priority.