论文部分内容阅读
刑事和解的客体是构建刑事和解制度的基础,也是刑事和解的指针、确定相应的争议范围和设立相应救济措施的对象。刑事和解的客体包括了实体法和程序法的双重价值,从当事人的角度考察,在程序法维度上,自诉案件刑事和解的对象是自诉人的诉权和被告人刑事责任的不被追究;在实体法维度上,刑事和解的客体不能是被告人行为的质,而只能是量,具体就是被告人的刑事可罚性;在事实维度上,刑事和解的客体是当事人双方的生活秩序。通过刑事和解的客体考察,表达了当事人在刑事诉讼的决定作用逐渐强化,而司法机关的刑事司法权则呈现为适当退缩的趋势,反映了我国的刑事司法出现了从司法能动主义向司法自制主义转化的印迹。
The object of criminal reconciliation is the basis of constructing the criminal reconciliation system and also the guideline of criminal reconciliation, determining the scope of the corresponding disputes and setting up the corresponding relief measures. The object of criminal reconciliation includes the dual values of substantive law and procedural law. From the perspective of the parties, in the procedural law dimension, the object of criminal reconciliation in private prosecution cases is the prosecutorial rights of the private prosecutor and the criminal responsibility of the accused. In the legal dimension, the object of criminal reconciliation can not be the quality of the defendant’s act, but only the quantity, specifically, the defendant’s criminal penalty; in fact dimension, the object of criminal reconciliation is the living order of both parties. Through the investigation of the object of criminal reconciliation, it expresses that the party’s role in the criminal procedure decision-making has been gradually strengthened, while the criminal jurisdiction of the judiciary has shown a tendency to retreat properly. This shows that there is a shift from judicial activism to judicial self-rule in our country’s criminal justice. Transformed blot.