论文部分内容阅读
野性的意象是一种特殊的符号,在以市场经济为主体的商品社会里,当物欲和诱惑引导着人们背离生命的本真时,野性代表着一种被压抑的原始人性力量,它体现了作者对缺乏个性和人文精神的商品社会的背离与反叛。它不仅寄托了乌托邦式的古典怀旧情绪,蕴涵了深层意义上的忧郁审美,从广义的层面上讲它更反映了小说作者对人类生命本真意义的痛苦思索和探求。19世纪末和20世纪初,具有维多利亚传统的美国中产阶级高雅文化;新的商品工业社会所形成的强大外力,都无一例外地对原始野性进行不同程度的压制和驯化。由此以来,野性的意象便被赋予了更加复杂的社会历史含义。本文将从不同的批评视角对杰克·伦敦的长篇小说《马丁·伊登》中关于野性意象的描写进行新的诠释。
The wild image is a special symbol. In the commodity society dominated by the market economy, when the materialism and temptation lead people to deviate from the true nature of life, the wildness represents a repressed primitive humanity force, which embodies The author’s departure from and rebellion against a commodity society lacking individuality and humanistic spirit. It embodies not only the utopian classical nostalgia but also the melancholy aesthetic in the deeper sense. It also reflects the painful thinking and exploration of the novelist on the true meaning of human life in a broad sense. The late 19th and early 20th centuries, with the Victorian tradition of the American middle class elegant culture; the new external force of the commodity industrial society, all without exception, the original wildness to varying degrees of repression and domestication. Since then, the wild image has been given a more complex social and historical implications. This essay will give a new interpretation of the description of the wild image in Jack London’s novel “Martin Eden” from different perspectives of criticism.