论文部分内容阅读
本文在陆建德有关西方现代“内省”诗学的论述基础上,指出在当前中国倡导西方“内省”诗学以及诗歌有利于中国现代诗歌主体的内省,能够丰富中国现代诗歌的内涵,促进中国现代诗歌乃至中国现代文化在“理性”层面的深度拓展。与此同时,本文也认为,我们不必采取“一废一立”的二元对立思维模式,在倡导西方“内省”诗学时排斥中国传统的“自美”诗学。为了阐明其中道理,本文在陆建德所采用的“介入式批评”方法之外,提出了“还原式批评”的方法,指出从文化“认信”逻辑来看,西方诗人是以“负面”的方法来“认信”社会文化规范的。相比之下,中国的“言志”诗人(即陆建德所说的“自美”诗人)则是通过“正面”的方法来“认信”社会文化规范的。中西诗人采取的方法不同,不过其所实现的文化“认信”结果是相同的,并无优劣之分。
On the basis of Lu Jiande’s discourse on modern Western introspection, Lu Jiande pointed out that at present China’s advocacy of western “introspection” poetics and the introspection of poetry in favor of the main body of modern Chinese poetry can enrich Chinese modern poetry Connotation, and promote the deep development of modern Chinese poetry and even modern Chinese culture at the level of “rationality”. At the same time, the article also holds that we do not have to adopt the dualistic paradox of “one country, one country and one country” and reject the traditional Chinese “poetic” theory when advocating Western “introspection” . In order to clarify the truth, this paper puts forward the method of “Critique of Reduction” in Lu Jiande’s “Interventional Criticism ” method, pointing out that from the perspective of culture “Confidence ”, western poets are “Negative ” approach “Confidence ” social and cultural norms. By contrast, China’s “poet” (that is, Lu Jiande’s “self-styled” poet) uses “positive” methods to “trust” and socialize cultural norms. The methods adopted by Chinese and Western poets are different, but the culture they realize is the same as the result of “recognition” and there is no advantage or disadvantage.