论文部分内容阅读
[目的]观察小儿肺炎的中医治疗与传统治疗的临床评价比较。[方法]收集小儿肺炎病例230例,分治疗组与对照组,记录两组患儿性别、年龄、发病情况,治疗组150例在传统中医红霉素与头孢菌素联合抗感染基础上,辅以中医辨证口服中药,外治疗法敷胸散敷胸,与对照组80例单纯红霉素,头孢菌素抗感染治疗比较。[结果]治疗组平均病程可缩短2～4天,肺部啰音消失明显,快于对照组。其中有效144例,3例无效,3例因患儿本人未坚持治疗而发展至迁延性肺炎,有效率达96%,而对照组总有效率仅为77.5%,且病程相对较长,治疗组的疗效优于对照组,两组疗效有显著差异(P<0.05)。[结论]中西医结合治疗确实提高了小儿肺炎的治愈率,缩短了病程,疗效确切,值得在临床推广。
[Objective] To observe the clinical evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine treatment and traditional treatment of pneumonia in children. [Methods] 230 cases of pediatric pneumonia were collected and divided into treatment group and control group. The gender, age and incidence of the two groups of children were recorded. The treatment group of 150 cases were supplemented with traditional Chinese medicine erythromycin and cephalosporin combined with anti-infective Chinese medicine oral TCM, external treatment of chest dressing chest, and the control group of 80 cases of simple erythromycin, cephalosporin anti-infective treatment comparison. [Result] The average duration of treatment group could be shortened by 2 ~ 4 days, the pulmonary rales disappeared obviously, faster than the control group. Among them, 144 cases were effective, 3 cases were ineffective, and 3 cases developed persistent pneumonia due to their failure to adhere to treatment. The effective rate was 96%, while the total effective rate was only 77.5% in the control group and the course was relatively longer. The curative effect was better than that of the control group, with significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). [Conclusion] Integrative Chinese and Western medicine did improve the cure rate of pneumonia in children, shorten the course of the disease, curative effect is exact, and worthy of clinical promotion.