论文部分内容阅读
制度统一是改革的方向,但是在养老金待遇上不宜搞简单的“一刀切”。以“平均主义”偷换“公平”的概念,将会产生新的不公。关于公务员养老,一些人觉得不公平,主要在两点:制度双轨,待遇偏高。在养老问题上,确实存在不同的制度设计。公务员是一套制度,企业职工是另一套制度。前者财政出钱,不用自掏腰包;后者财政不出钱,由企业和个人分担。制度性的不平等,容易造成职业壁垒,阻碍劳动力合理流动,有时甚至加剧社会矛盾。从长远来看,应当将公务员纳入到统一的基本养老保险制度内,
The reunification of the system is the direction of reform, but it is not appropriate to engage in simple “one size fits all” in the treatment of pensions. The concept of “fairness” escaped with “egalitarianism ” will create new injustices. Regarding civil service pensions, some people find it unfair, mainly on two points: the double track of the system and the high pay. There are indeed different system designs on the issue of pension. Civil servant is a system, enterprise workers is another system. The former financial money, not out of pocket; the latter financial money, by businesses and individuals to share. Institutional inequalities easily lead to occupational barriers, hinder the rational flow of labor force, and sometimes even aggravate social conflicts. In the long run, civil servants should be included in the unified basic old-age insurance system,