论文部分内容阅读
我想,我们在讨论计划与市场的关系时,可否不直接讨论两者如何结合,而去认真讨论一下如何搞好我们的计划体制和计划工作,使商品经济有计划、高效益地发展与增长。因为直接讨论两者的关系。容易产生形而上学的观点,先把两者分割再结合,不可避免地会出现“板块论”、“渗透论”等。有的习惯提法在科学意义上还需要进一步推敲。如“计划经济与市场调节相结合”的提法,总感到有些不确切。这一提法会使人以为“计划经济”这一块可以超越市场,“市场调节”这一块可以不要任何计划,两者的结合就成了“无市场的计划经济与无计划的市场调节相结合”的同义语。这样的两者结合怎么会实现计划经济呢?事实上,与计
I think when discussing the relationship between the plan and the market, we can not directly discuss how the two can be combined. Instead, we should seriously discuss how to improve our planning system and planning so that the commodity economy will develop and grow in a planned and cost-effective manner . Because of the direct discussion of the relationship between the two. Easy to produce metaphysical point of view, the first split and re-combination of the two will inevitably appear “plate theory”, “infiltration theory” and so on. Some habits of reference in the scientific sense still need further consideration. Such as “the combination of planned economy and market regulation,” the general feeling some uncertainty. This formulation would make people think that the “planned economy” can transcend the market and that “market regulation” can not require any plan. The combination of the two has become a combination of a “market-free planned economy and an unplanned market adjustment ”Synonymous. How can such a combination of the two bring about a planned economy? In fact, with the plan