论文部分内容阅读
以书写论为核心的解构主义语言观摧毁了形而上学赖以存在的基础———以此在为存在形态的世界 ,从而给传统的、依赖于固定阐释结构的文学批评模式带来了危机 ,同时也引来了备受争议的耶鲁学派解构批评模式。本文认为 ,以艾布拉姆斯为首的批评家通过批判J .H .米勒的批评方法质疑解构主义语言论 ,一方面会因为无视解构思想的目的和手段之间固有的矛盾而无法达到目标 ,另一方面 ,他们也揭示出批评实践不可能脱离“形而上欲望”的支配 ,从而指出了耶鲁解构批评的谬误所在。
The deconstructionist linguistic view centered on the theory of writing destroys the foundations upon which metaphysics relies - thereby creating a crisis in the traditional mode of literary criticism that relies on a fixed interpretation of the structure, Also attracted the controversial Yale School deconstruction criticism. This article argues that critics headed by Abrams questioned deconstruction linguistics by criticizing J.H. Miller’s criticism on the one hand and could not achieve his goal because of ignoring the inherent contradiction between the purpose and means of deconstruction thinking On the other hand, they also reveal that it is impossible to break away from the domination of “metaphysical desire” by criticizing practice, thus pointing out the fallacy of Yale deconstruction criticism.