论文部分内容阅读
“中国法律”杂志2005年4月号“学者说法”一栏中刊登了由顾敏康助理教授撰写的文章“中国公司法修改草案(以下简称第一草案)点评”。文章末部“修改草案仍然存在的问题”一段中提出“公司章程的定性仍然未明”。公司章程是公司与股东、股东与股东之问的法律强制合同,其他雇员不得以此作为诉讼的论据。第一草案加入“其他高级职员”一词,容许他们根据公司章程进行拆讼,顾教授认为这种规定“不知是一种进步,还是一种退步。”本文以此为重点,对公司章程进行全面考察;比较社会主义法系的中华人民共和国(以下简称大陆)公司法(以下简称大陆公司法)、普通法系的中华人民共和国香港特
“China Law ” magazine in April 2005 issue of “scholar ” column published by the article written by Assistant Professor Gu Minkang “Chinese company law revision draft (hereinafter referred to as the first draft) comment ”. At the end of the article “the problem still exists in the revised draft ” paragraph proposed “the constitution of the company is still not clear ”. The articles of association of the company are legal compulsory contracts between the company and its shareholders, shareholders and shareholders. Other employees should not use this as an argument for lawsuits. The first draft to join “other officers ” the word, allowing them to be dismantled according to the articles of association, Gu Professor that such provisions “I do not know is a kind of progress, or a step backward.” This article focuses on this, To conduct a comprehensive inspection of the articles of association of the Company; to compare the Company Law of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the “Mainland Company Law”) of the Socialist Law Department, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China