论文部分内容阅读
苏格拉底在《理想国》中对绘画、诗和戏剧进行了考察,认为它们不能提供真知,诗更是激起了城邦公民的情感和欲望,破坏了由理性建构起的城邦的正义和秩序。苏格拉底将诗人与将军、法律制定者相比,认为:诗模仿心灵的低级部分,诗人是城邦正义的破坏者,扰乱心灵理性部分的罪魁祸首,并将诗人驱逐出理想国。本文通过对《理想国》“诗论”的分析,确定古希腊政治哲学、伦理学“知”的背景,与中国政治哲学、伦理学“诗”的背景之间存在着巨大的差异,从而厘清早期中西政治文化和伦理文化的不同建基。
Socrates conducted a survey of paintings, poems and plays in “The Dreamland”, believing that they could not provide true knowledge. Poetry even provoked the feelings and desires of the citizens of the city-state and undermined the justice and order of the city-state from the rational construction . Socrates compared poets with generals and lawmakers in the belief that poetry mimics the inferior part of the mind, the poet is the saboteur of city-state justice, disrupts the culprit of the spiritual rationale, and expels the poet from the ideal nation. Through the analysis of “Republic of China” and “Poetic Theory”, this article determines the background of ancient Greek political philosophy and ethics “knowledge ”, and the background of Chinese political philosophy and ethics "poem Huge differences, so as to clarify the different construction of early Western and Chinese political culture and ethical culture.