论文部分内容阅读
我的《读<藤野先生>》(发表于《语文教学参考》一九七八年第一期)一文,浙江师院陈祖楠、北京中央民族学院刘善良等同志谈了一些意见(同刊初中版一九七八年第四期),现把这些意见归纳几条,也谈点意见。一、关于《藤野先生》的主题。这是历来有争议的问题,总起来说,一种意见认为主要是写藤野先生的,另一种则认为主要是抒发爱国主义感情的。我的意见是前者,因为事实上作者的主要笔墨是用来写藤野这个人物的,文章的题目也表达了这一点。如果把我这个意见打个比喻,便是:《藤野先生》是一株树,藤野这个人物就好比树的主干,其它的——如陈祖楠所列举的许多,这里不赘述——都是树枝和树叶。我有一个笨拙的设想,如果我们对小学生讲述一下文章的内容,然后问他们:这篇文章说的是什么呀?
My article “Reading Mr. Fujino” (published in “Language Teaching Reference”, 1st edition, 1978), Chen Zhenan, Zhejiang Normal University, and Liu Shanliang, Beijing Central University for Nationalities, shared some opinions. In the fourth issue of 1978, these opinions are summarized and some opinions are also discussed. I. The theme of Mr. Fujino. This is a historically controversial issue. Generally speaking, one opinion is that it is mainly written by Mr. Fujino, and the other one is that it is mainly about patriotic feelings. My opinion is the former, because in fact the author’s main writing is used to write the character Fujino. The title of the article also expresses this point. If I use this metaphor as a metaphor, it is: “Mr. Fujino” is a tree. The character of Fujino is like the trunk of the tree. Others – as many as Chen Chu-nan listed here, not to repeat here – are both branches and Leaves. I have a clumsy idea, if we talk about the content of the article to the elementary school students, then ask them: What is the article saying?