论文部分内容阅读
在一次作文竞赛中,就一名学生的作文应不应该给予奖励发生了争论.这个学生的作文记叙的是他暑假去北京探亲时,在火车上经历的一件事.其实,这个学生家就住在宁夏,爸爸也在本地工作,根本无一亲人在北京,作文中所写的事情,是移花接木,一纯属虚构.有的教师认为,这篇文章的事情 虽属虚构,但记述生动,情节曲折、条理清楚,文字流畅,应该奖励.有的教师认为,这篇文章是编造的,不应评为优秀作文.从这篇文章的争论中,反映了一个问题:中学生写记叙文时,能不能虚构?
In a essay contest, there is an argument about whether a student’s composition should be rewarded. This student’s essay describes what he experienced on the train when he went to visit his relatives in Beijing on summer vacation. In fact, this student’s home Living in Ningxia, my father also works in the locality. There is no relative at all in Beijing. Writing in the composition is a matter of making a living. It is purely fictional. Some teachers believe that this article is fictional but vividly written. The plots are twists and turns, the rules are clear, the text is fluent and should be rewarded. Some teachers believe that this article is made up and should not be rated as excellent composition. From this article’s controversy, it reflects a problem: When middle school students write narratives, they can Can not be made up?