论文部分内容阅读
中國哲學史學科誕生之初,因過分依賴西方哲學史的框架結構,加之適逢中國學術界疑古思潮盛行,所以在史料建設方面存在著嚴重的問题:一是以西方哲學史為標準剪裁中國哲學史史料;二是對于一些重要的歷史人物和重要的哲學典籍,因疑其偽,或忽视,或錯誤地加以處理。經過百來年的發展,後者拜出土文獻之賜,已有所改觀;前者則至今尚無本質的反思。本文對此進行討論。
At the beginning of the birth of the discipline of Chinese philosophy, due to the over-dependence on the framework of the history of Western philosophy and the prevalence of suspected trend of thoughts in Chinese academia, there were serious problems in the construction of historical materials. First, the history of western philosophy was used to tailor China Historical materials of the history of philosophy; secondly, it deals with some important historical figures and important philosophical books because of their false or neglected, or mistakenly handled. After a hundred years of development, the latter has benefited from the unearthed literature, and the former has not yet had any introspection so far. This article discusses this.