论文部分内容阅读
本文通过对殷墟王陵区大墓之上晚期遗迹的系统梳理,一方面重新论证了王陵区大墓早期盗掘坑的形成年代,认为其形成当在报告所认为的“小屯文化期”的“灰堆”、“灰坑”及墓葬之后,年代上限不早于西周中期,下限不晚于汉代;另一方面为“殷墟文化第四期最末阶段的部分遗存,尽管文化属性仍可归于商文化,但其年代应已进入西周初年”的观点,补充了相关证据,即周公二次东征之后,殷墟王陵区大墓之上有人类活动,所遗留的部分器物,虽与殷墟第四期器物相似,但其年代已进入西周。
On the one hand, it re-demonstrates the formation age of the robbery pits in the early tomb of the imperial tombs, and considers that the formation of the tunnel when considered in the report is “Xiaotun Culture Period ”“ Ash pile ”,“ pits ”and tombs after the upper limit of the upper limit of the early Western Zhou Dynasty, the lower limit of no less than the Han Dynasty; the other hand,“ the fourth part of the Yin Ruins culture the last part of the remains Although the cultural attributes can still be attributed to the commercial culture, its age should have entered the early years of the Western Zhou Dynasty, ”adding the relevant evidence that after the second Eastern Zhou Dynasty, Zhou had human activities above the tomb in the Imperial Mausoleum of Yin, Some of the remaining artifacts, similar to the fourth artifact of Yin Ruins, have entered the Western Zhou Dynasty.