论文部分内容阅读
程序正义理论二十世纪六七十年代产生于英美国家,在我国的司法实践中,对程序正义的重视远远不够,对于程序正义的价值在法律上没有得到广泛的认同。程序正义是司法公正的重要组成方面,司法活动本身应当严格按照一定的法律程序进行,只有通过一定的程序实现的正义才是社会所能接受的正义。因此,程序正义在最低限度内提出了自身的基本要求,即参与、平等、中立、隔离和自治。本文从程序正义的内容入手,结合我国诉讼中的现状,分析了程序正义的价值,以及实现程序正义的基本内在要求。
The theory of procedural justice originated in Anglo-American countries in the 1960s and 1970s. In our country’s judicial practice, the emphasis on procedural justice is far from adequate. The value of procedural justice is not legally recognized widely. Procedural justice is an important part of judicial justice. Judicial activities should be carried out strictly in accordance with certain legal procedures. Only justice achieved through certain procedures is just what the society can accept. Thus, procedural justice sets forth, at a minimum, its own basic requirements of participation, equality, neutrality, segregation and autonomy. Starting with the content of procedural justice, this article analyzes the value of procedural justice and the basic internal requirements of realizing procedural justice in light of the status quo in our lawsuit.