论文部分内容阅读
在实行诉讼对抗制的国家 ,人们可以通过以下三种方法使信息技术证据成为保护企业利益的一种工具 :( 1 )起诉 ,包括刑事诉讼 ;( 2 )法庭辩护 ;( 3 )为规则制定者和企业作出重要决策提供依据。然而 ,对于什么样的信息技术证据具有可采信性 ,人们仍有质疑。计算机法学正是研究如何确定、保存、分析及如何提交数字证据的一门新兴的学科。尽管传统上计算机法学被认为是一门滞后的学科 ,但是澳大利亚《信息技术证据管理指引》还是前瞻性地规定了能使电子证据效力最大化的系统生存周期的一些重要原则
In countries where the lawsuit is adversarial, there are three ways in which people can make IT evidence a tool to protect their interests: (1) prosecution, including criminal proceedings; (2) court defense; (3) And enterprises to make important decisions to provide the basis. However, there is still doubt as to what kind of information technology evidence is admissible. Computer law is just a new discipline that studies how to identify, preserve, analyze, and submit digital evidence. Although computer law has traditionally been considered a lagging discipline, the Australian Guide to Managing Evidence of Information provides forward-looking rules that set out some of the key principles of a system’s life-cycle that maximizes the effectiveness of electronic evidence