论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨比较宫腔镜电切术与刮宫术治疗子宫出血患者的临床效果。方法:选取2013年3月-2014年4月本院收治的子宫出血患者共84例作为研究对象,使用随机数字表法分为观察组以及对照组各42例。其中观察组患者给予宫腔镜下电切术治疗,对照组患者给予宫腔镜下刮宫术治疗,观察两组患者的手术效果,统计两组患者病发原因检出率以及术后3个月患者的手术满意度。结果:观察组患者在手术时间、住院时间上明显少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组患者与对照组患者在术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组病发原因检出率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组患者术后满意度97.6%,明显高于对照组的85.7%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:宫腔镜下电切术与刮宫术相比,在治疗子宫出血患者上有较好的临床疗效,患者术后满意度较高。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of hysteroscopic resection and curettage in patients with uterine bleeding. Methods: A total of 84 cases of uterine bleeding admitted to our hospital from March 2013 to April 2014 were selected as the study subjects, and randomly divided into observation group and control group with 42 cases in each group. The patients in the observation group were treated by hysteroscopic resection and the control group were treated by hysteroscopic curettage. The surgical effects of the two groups were observed. The detection rate of the two groups of patients and the incidence of the cause of the disease in three groups Patient’s surgical satisfaction. Results: The observation group had less operation time and hospitalization time, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications among observation group and control group (P> 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of the two groups (P> 0.05). The postoperative satisfaction rate in the observation group was 97.6%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (85.7%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions: Compared with curettage, hysteroscopic resection has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of uterine bleeding, and the patients’ postoperative satisfaction is higher.