论文部分内容阅读
目的对比探讨曲美他嗪和硝酸异山梨酯治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛的疗效。方法 106例稳定型劳力性心绞痛患者,随机分为对照组(52例)与观察组(54例)。对照组在常规治疗基础上采用硝酸异山梨酯治疗,观察组在常规治疗基础上给予曲美他嗪治疗。比较两组治疗效果。结果观察组的总有效率94.44%优于对照组的80.77%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的不良反应发生率3.7%优于对照组的15.4%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论曲美他嗪在治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛具有较高的治疗药用价值,同时可降低不良反应发生率,值得在临床推广应用。
Objective To compare the efficacy of trimetazidine and isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of stable angina pectoris. Methods 106 patients with stable angina pectoris were randomly divided into control group (52 cases) and observation group (54 cases). The control group was treated with isosorbide dinitrate on the basis of conventional treatment. The observation group was treated with trimetazidine on the basis of routine treatment. Compare the treatment effect of two groups. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 94.44%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (80.77%, P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 3.7% better than that in the control group (15.4%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Trimetazidine in the treatment of stable angina pectoris has high therapeutic value, and can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions, it is worth in the clinical application.