论文部分内容阅读
国有企业的党风廉政建设和监督问题是当前国有企业改革的重大课题。去年6月初,我们在省内的一些国有大型、特大型企业就国有企业的党风廉政建设和监督机制的状况,进行了深入的调查研究,总的认为党风廉政建设的主流是好的,监督机制发挥了应有的作用,但一些问题还应当引起我们的深思。 一、企业的各种监督机构事实上处于从属地位,没有形成强有力的监督制约格局 国有企业的监督机制从理论上来说,已构成了以党组织的监督、纪检监察、审计监督、工会的民主监督以及职工群众监督的监督网络,但是,从实践看,改革开放以来,对企业领导干部特别是对企业法人代表的监督问题,迄今为止,并没有从根本上得到解决。包括企业党委在内的各种监督机构都处于企业行政的从属地位,加上利益的一致性等因素的影响,对企业的行政领导干部的监督制约普遍乏力,难以实施真正有效的监督。 1、有的企业的党委监督不了企业的法人代表。调查中,党委系统的领导干部普遍反映,虽然中央4号文件对党委在企业的政治核心地位、参与重大决策、党管干部等作出了明确的规定,但是,党委对企业的影响事实上减弱的趋势并没
The construction and supervision of the party's style of a clean government in state-owned enterprises are major issues for the current reform of state-owned enterprises. In early June last year, some state-owned large-scale and large-scale enterprises in the province conducted an in-depth investigation and study on the status quo of the party's style of building an honest and clean government in the state-owned enterprises and the supervision mechanism. Overall, the mainstream of the party's work style and building a clean government are good, The supervisory mechanism has played its due role, but some problems should arouse our deep consideration. First, the various supervisory bodies of the enterprises are in fact subordinate and do not form a strong supervision and restriction mechanism. In theory, the supervision mechanism of state-owned enterprises has formed a system of supervision by the party organizations, discipline inspection and supervision, auditing and supervision, and the trade union's democracy Supervision and monitoring of the workforce. However, from the practical point of view, since the reform and opening up, the supervision over the leading cadres of enterprises, especially the corporate legal representatives, has so far not been fundamentally solved. All kinds of supervisory bodies, including enterprise party committees, are in the subordinate position of corporate administration. Coupled with the influence of the consistency of interests, the supervision and restriction on the administrative leading cadres of enterprises are generally weak and it is difficult to implement the real and effective supervision. 1, some corporate party committee can not supervise corporate legal representatives. During the investigation, the leading cadres in the party committee system generally reflected that while the Central Document No.4 made clear the stipulations on the party's political centrality in the enterprise, participating in major decisions, and administering party cadres, the influence of the party committees on the enterprises actually weakened The trend did not