论文部分内容阅读
不久前,《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法》出台,和之前的征求意见稿相比,新版本做了多处调整,包括同约车的报废标准以及驾驶员的资质等,兼顾了车主与乘客的利益,回应了公众对于安全问题的关切,顺应了民意,得到普遍好评。眼下,人们期待的是,地方政府如何制定细则,细则能否顺应改革的方向,而不是减损改革的力度。在网约车新政出台之前,这一业态的发展处于相当尴尬的状态。一方面,网约车为公众出行提供了物美价廉的新选择,得到认可:而另一方面,网约车没有合法地位。现实中,
Not long ago, “Internet booking taxi management services Interim Measures,” promulgated, and the previous draft compared to the new version made a number of adjustments, including the same car with the retirement standards and the driver’s qualifications, taking into account the owner In the interest of passengers, the public responded to the public’s concern about security issues, complied with public opinions and won universal acclaim. Right now, what people expect is how local governments formulate rules that can be followed in the direction of reform instead of detracting from the reform. In the network before the introduction of the New Deal, the development of this format in a very awkward position. On the one hand, the network of vehicles for the public to travel cheap and affordable new options, be recognized: On the other hand, the network car has no legal status. in reality,