论文部分内容阅读
在二十世纪中国的学问大师当中,胡适无疑算得上是一个最不安分、最不“纯粹”的学者。他留洋拿的是哲学博士学位,可一部《中国哲学史》却只写了上部而无心再续;早年“逼上梁山”,首举义旗,力倡白话文,可于新诗却也只是“尝试”了一下就撒手,而一部《白话文学史》到头来终究只是半部杰作;虽说对考据有着终身不渝的癖好,但又不过是零打碎敲、难成气候,至于他自己颇为得意的“红学”研究,其成就恐怕还是比不上俞平伯。胡适对自己在学术研究上的这种打一枪换一个地方的做法所带来的遗憾每每耿耿于怀,也常常信誓旦旦地表示过要“专心于学问”,至少是要把他那几部半拉子的著作写完。但是,一生忙忙碌碌且又兴
Among the great masters of learning in China in the twentieth century, Hu Shi was undoubtedly regarded as one of the most restless and least “pure” scholars. He holds a Ph.D. in foreign studies but can only write an upper part of the history of Chinese philosophy but does not have the intention to continue. In his early years, he forced Liangshan, advocating justice and advocating Vernacular, but he just tried it After a while, a “vernacular literature history” is only half a masterpiece after all. Although it has a lifelong hobby to the test, it is nothing more than a zero-break knock and a difficult climate. As for his own “Red Learning” I am afraid its success is still less than Yu Ping Bo. Hu Shih always regretted his regret over his practice of punching a shot in academic research and often vowed to “concentrate on learning,” at least in part, Child’s writing finished. However, busy life and rejuvenation