论文部分内容阅读
罗尔斯在《万民法》中所提出的国际正义学说近来已经受到一些世界主义正义观的倡导者的严厉批评。借助于罗尔斯的政治本体论,可以表明这些批评者对罗尔斯的批评在某些重要的方面是令人误解的,罗尔斯不仅对基本人权的实现持有一个普遍主义的承诺,而且其国际正义理论因为充分认识到了合理的多元主义的事实与分配正义的本质而在理论上具有独特的优越性、在实践上具有现实的可行性。
Rawls’s theory of international justice, proposed in the “Universal Civil Law,” has recently been severely criticized by some advocators of the cosmopolitan justice concept. With Rawls’s political ontology, it can be shown that criticism of Rawls by these critics is misleading in some important respects. Rawls not only holds a universal commitment to the realization of basic human rights, And its international justice theory has its unique superiority in theory because it fully recognizes the fact of reasonable pluralism and the nature of distributive justice, and is practically feasible in practice.