论文部分内容阅读
作为保护人权的国际区域性机构,欧洲人权法院在人权保护方面所作的贡献和所起的作用是有目共睹、毋庸置疑的。《保护人权和基本自由欧洲公约》之于欧洲人权法院,好比水之于鱼,皮之于毛。古语有言,皮之不存,毛将焉附?欧洲人权公约不仅亲手塑造了欧洲人权法院,而且见证了其风风雨雨的发展历程。因此,了解甚或仅仅大致了解欧洲人权公约的存续始末,对理解欧洲人权法院的运作及其判例有百益而无一害。基于此,本文分别从起源、适用的原则、限制性规定及其对缔约国国内法律体系的影响等5个方面对《保护人权和基本自由欧洲公约》展开了述评。
As the international regional organization for the protection of human rights, the contribution and the role of the European Court of Human Rights in the protection of human rights are obvious and unquestionable. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in the European Court of Human Rights, is like water in fish and skin in hair. The old saying goes, the skin does not exist, Mao will attach? The European Convention on Human Rights not only hand-shaped the European Court of Human Rights, but also witnessed the ups and downs of the course of development. Therefore, understanding or even a general understanding of the existence and existence of the European Convention on Human Rights does nothing to understand the operation of the European Court of Human Rights and its jurisprudence. Based on this, this article reviews the “European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms” respectively from five aspects: its origin, applicable principles, restrictive provisions and its impact on the domestic legal system of the State party.