论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨经桡动脉和经股动脉两种途径行冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的临床效果。方法 60例急性心肌梗死患者,随机分为桡动脉组和股动脉组,各30例。就两组患者的治疗效果进行综合性的比较和分析。结果两组患者在血管穿刺时间、穿刺成功率、手术时间及手术成功率上比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);桡动脉组住院时间和并发症发生率优于股动脉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在急性心肌梗死患者的临床治疗中,采用经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗兼具有效性和安全性,可将其列为急性心肌梗死治疗的第一选择。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of transradial and trans femoral arterial coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods Sixty patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly divided into radial artery group and femoral artery group, 30 cases each. On the two groups of patients with a comprehensive comparison of treatment and analysis. Results There was no significant difference in the puncture time, puncture success rate, operation time and operation success rate between the two groups (P> 0.05). The incidence of hospitalization and complications in the radial artery group was superior to that in the femoral artery group There was statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion In the clinical treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction, the use of transradial coronary intervention is both effective and safe, which can be listed as the first choice for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction.