论文部分内容阅读
美国文化标榜其言论自由的价值观。美国宪法第一修正案对言论自由有似乎明确的条款规定 ,但是对于该条款的意义 ,历史学家 ,法学家 ,甚至参与制定宪法的人之间都无法达成相同的见解。在当代社会现实中 ,所谓“象征性言论”究竟是言论还是行动 ?宪法文本意义本身对此无从解答。文本意义的确定需要超越其自身的其他因素。本文探讨了文本意义的解读 ,社会、政治现实和概念逻辑演进的互动关系。
American culture advertises its values of freedom of speech. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has clearly stipulated provisions on the freedom of speech, but neither can the historians, jurists and even those involved in the formulation of the Constitution reach the same view on the meaning of the clause. In the realities of contemporary society, what is the so-called “symbolic remarks” that are words or actions? There is no solution to the meaning of the constitutional text itself. The meaning of the text needs to be determined beyond other factors of its own. This article explores the interaction of text meaning interpretation, social, political reality and evolution of conceptual logic.