论文部分内容阅读
目的比较血液灌流与血液灌流联合连续性血液净化治疗百草枯中毒的疗效。方法 69例百草枯中毒患者分组后分别给予血液灌流、血液灌流联合连续性血液净化治疗,观察其3月内疗效。结果血液灌流组39例患者中死亡28例,好转11例,有效率为28.20%;血液灌流联合连续性血液净化组30例患者中死亡14例,好转16例,有效率53.33%。血液灌流联合连续性血液净化治疗百草枯中毒的有效率较血液灌流有效率高(P=0.034)。结论血液灌流联合连续性血液净化治疗百草枯中毒是比血液灌流更为有效的治疗方式。
Objective To compare the efficacy of hemoperfusion and hemoperfusion combined with continuous blood purification in the treatment of paraquat poisoning. Methods 69 cases of paraquat poisoning patients were given hemoperfusion, hemoperfusion combined with continuous blood purification treatment, observe the effect within 3 months. Results Among the 39 patients in the hemoperfusion group, 28 patients died and 11 patients improved. The effective rate was 28.20%. Among the 30 patients hemoperfusion combined with continuous blood purification, 14 patients died and 16 patients improved, with an effective rate of 53.33%. The efficiency of hemoperfusion combined with continuous blood purification in treating paraquat poisoning is more effective than hemoperfusion (P = 0.034). Conclusion Hemoperfusion combined with continuous blood purification for paraquat poisoning is more effective than hemoperfusion.