论文部分内容阅读
对于世界范围内不同青铜文化的研究,多数学者主要是集中于器物本身的造物设计形式,而对器物形式起源的分析相对较少。青铜文化的发展不应仅仅是关注器物的形式,更应该关注器物设计形式的缘由。对比乌尔王朝与中国青铜文化的发展途径可以发现,在古代生产力并不发达的时代,生产资料是不同青铜文化发展缘由的关键要素之一,也是中国与乌尔王朝的青铜文化走向千差万别的起始。而在现代设计中,对现有生产资料和生产技术的调配与重构,对产品制造同样具有重要意义。
For the study of different bronze cultures in the world, most scholars mainly focus on the design forms of artifacts themselves, while the analysis of the origin of artifacts is relatively few. The development of bronze culture should not only be concerned with the form of artifacts, but also should be concerned about the design of utensils. Comparing the development paths of the Urres and the Chinese bronze culture, we can find that in the era when the ancient productive forces were undeveloped, the means of production were one of the key elements that gave rise to different reasons for the development of the bronze culture and that the bronze culture of China and the Ur dynasty started to differ greatly from each other beginning. In the modern design, the allocation and reconstruction of the existing means of production and production technology are also of great significance to the manufacture of products.