论文部分内容阅读
对大规模侵权的界定仍应以概念表述的客观要素为基本条件,过多的界定因素反而繁琐且无实际意义。尽管与传统侵权相比,大规模侵权纠纷具有被侵权人人数众多、诉求利益多元、主体地位不平等等特性,但其仍存在于侵权构成要件的基本框架之内,而大规模侵权自身对社会发展也兼具正反两方面功能,以客观的、不带任何偏见和意识形态的态度去分析大规模侵权纠纷,是构建正当的有效的大规模侵权救济机制的基本理论素养和前提。
The definition of mass infringement should still be based on the objective elements of the concept of expression as the basic conditions, too many defining elements but cumbersome and not practical significance. Although compared with the traditional infringement, the large-scale infringement dispute has such characteristics as numerous infringers, diverse interests and inequitable position of the main body, but it still exists within the basic framework of infringement elements, The development also has both positive and negative functions. Analyzing the large-scale infringement disputes objectively without any prejudice and ideology is the basic theoretical accomplishment and premise for establishing a valid and effective large-scale infringement relief mechanism.