论文部分内容阅读
辛普森案中犯罪嫌疑人在有诸多不利证据指向他的情况下,借助梦幻律师团队的全力辩护,最终获得无罪的判决。而美国警方与检方,因为没有真正尊重最基本逻辑规律,诸多铁证失去效力。在这场法律逻辑思维的大比拼中,逻辑成为决定结果的重要武器。该案例可以帮我们理解四大逻辑规律对于司法实践不可或缺的作用。
The Simpson case criminal suspects in the presence of a lot of adverse evidence pointing to him, with the full defense of the team of fantasy lawyers eventually won the verdict of innocence. The United States police and prosecutors, because they did not really respect the most basic logical laws, many ironclad ineffective. In this legal logical debate, logic becomes an important weapon in determining the outcome. This case can help us understand the four logical laws that are indispensable to judicial practice.