论文部分内容阅读
运用文献资料法,对比分析法,并结合逻辑分析对中国知网(CNKI)数据库中1999-2006年发表于中文体育类核心期刊的涉及运动员竞技能力评价的66篇期刊论文,9篇硕士学位论文,2篇博士学位论文中评价标准临界值的界定方法进行研究和分析,研究结果认为,此类研究中对于评价对象发生质变临界点的界定均为研究者主观设置,缺乏必要的客观依据和创新性,致使大多数研究只局限于理论层面上,而和运动训练实践结合不够紧密,最终导致评价结果对体育运动实践的实际指导意义不大。创新点为,在确定评价对象发生质变的临界点时要让教练员参与评价过程,应基于教练员对运动员竞技能力的定性评价,这样既能做到有据可循,又可使定性和定量评价相结合,最终才有可能使评价主体所做的工作在训练实践中得到使用者的认可和接受。并列举了实例进行了说明。
By means of literature review, comparative analysis and logistic analysis, 66 journal articles and 9 master’s dissertations on evaluation of competitive ability of athletes published in CNKI database published in Chinese sports journals from 1999 to 2006 , Two PhD dissertations in the evaluation criteria for the critical value of the method of research and analysis of the study concluded that such studies on the evaluation of the critical point of occurrence of qualitative changes are researchers subjective settings, the lack of the necessary objective basis and innovation Therefore, most of the researches are limited to the theoretical level, but not close enough to the practice of sports training, which leads to the fact that the evaluation results have little practical guidance on the practice of sports. The innovation point is that to make the trainer participate in the evaluation process when determining the critical point of the qualitative change of the evaluation object, the qualitative evaluation of the competitive ability of the athlete should be based on the trainer. In this way, both the evidence-based and the qualitative and quantitative In the end, it is possible to make the work done by the evaluation subject recognized and accepted by users in training practice. An example is given as an example.